🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, public demonstration has ceased to be a basic freedom. Instead, it has become a conditional permission that authorities grant or deny as they see fit. This constitutes the implication of new regulations that the current government is advancing, which would determine when and where protests can occur, with potential prison sentences for those who defy these limitations.

Gradual Weakening of Civil Liberties

Previous administrations had already weakened this fundamental freedom: the former Conservative government had granted law enforcement extensive additional powers, which global rights bodies had censured as "significant and undue limitations" on democratic freedoms. Collectively, these progressive assaults on liberty have practically abolished the hard-won right to freedom of protest.

Exploiting Atrocity to Rationalize Suppression

The latest limitations are being justified by citing last week's terrible antisemitic attack on a British Islamic center. There should be universal agreement that the security of British Jews must be protected. However, using this atrocity as a pretext to suppress opposition is not only unrelated to that duty but distorts it.

"If you can't draw the line at mass killing, you likely can't establish limits at democratic principles," commented a prominent American author, a statement that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Demonstration

Consider Britain's long tradition of public demonstration and direct action against racism and authoritarianism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to after World War II Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s demonstrations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were labeled as extremists in their era, even while they were advocating the rights of marginalized groups.

Current Reality

In the current complicated landscape, here's what's actually happening: Israel – a sovereign nation – is committing acts that international bodies have characterized as genocide. Its warfare have led the global justice body to issue arrest warrants against Israel's prime minister and his former defense minister.

International popular sentiment has changed significantly against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a substantial majority of the public think Israel has likely committed international law violations. Most people would endorse a total prohibition on weapons exports to the nation, and approve the detention of the Israeli leader.

Silencing Dissent

Having essentially lost the argument, Israel's supporters are now exploiting a despicable antisemitic crime to try to silence a popular campaign against a ethical disaster. The British government appears to be included in this effort. Government officials have failed to implement comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have permitted arms exports to proceed.

People who are demonstrating against the destruction of Gaza have been characterized as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these protesters until now: extremely few protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement minimal reason to take action.

Dangerous Conflation

Equating Jewish identity with the actions of the government of Israel is not only manipulative but also dangerous. The official definition of anti-Jewish prejudice, accepted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately questioned for potentially stifling legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its key examples: that "holding Jewish people generally accountable for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've reached a situation where police authorities can propose that demonstrations opposing Israel's actions should be canceled because they might "accidentally or intentionally" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, government officials have declared that recognition of Palestine as a nation has made organizations "complicit" in supposed mistreatment faced by Jewish communities.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the very day as the synagogue attack, the Israel's army killed numerous of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – adding to the terrible count from two years of ongoing violence that have claimed tens of thousands of lives. British politicians and media outlets have barely concealed the minimal importance they assign to Palestinian life. This represents one of the boldest expressions of discrimination in contemporary society.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already passed a concerning boundary by banning a specific activist group, a peaceful, anti-genocide direct action organization. Thousands of British protesters have been arrested, primarily for holding placards against mass killing and supporting the banned organization. Many of those detained are elderly citizens; including a former clergyman and the child of a World War II genocide survivor.

International Parallels

It's not difficult to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped vilify pro-Palestinian protests: a ex-political leader suggested that some were "linked with" other nations, while the current president characterized such protests as anti-Jewish. In doing so, they contributed to normalizing the authoritarian crackdown on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be granted sweeping powers to suppress opposition. What might a Reform government do with this repressive toolkit? Our ancestors fought, endured hardship and died to establish our liberties. We may eventually regret how casually we permitted them to be eroded.