🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, Battlefield Studios launched a fresh game mode called Casual Breakthrough. To put it simply, this option mirrors the standard Breakthrough setup but includes several key adjustments:

• Each team includes only eight real players, with the rest made up of 32 bots.
• Actions performed by real players award complete experience points, while AI activities provide lower rewards.
• Just a pair of locations can be played: Siege of Cairo and Empire State map.
• Elements like Player tags, accolades, and stat tracking have been turned off.

So essentially, this mode lives up to its name: it's a laid-back take of Breakthrough. On the surface, one could assume there's nothing wrong, as it provides more options for gamers seeking different methods to enjoy the game. However, gaming history has shown one thing, it is that not everyone will be happy. Which is to say, a lot of Battlefield 6 fans are upset.

Community Responses: From Fury to Support

"Gamers prefer real players. Don't repeat the mistakes of your rivals," states one reply to the official announcement. "Absolutely shocking idea," comments a different user. At the same time, on the Battlefield subreddit, a player remarks, "I have no idea where we are going with this title," while another details everything they consider to be problematic in Battlefield 6: "Resolve glitches, fix drone glitch, fix IVF rockets, adjust aiming after sprinting, improve hit detection. We do not require this AI-heavy playlist."

On the other hand, amid the criticism, some gamers sharing how much they're enjoying the new mode. "It's very fun to warm up, human participants prevent it from being a complete grind but it's quite laid-back," says a forum post. "The community doesn't understand that there are gamers who actually go outside and don't play this game 24/7. Let them strike a balance," states another. A response via social media explains that as they're "a battledad with busy schedules, this is great for me," and another applauds the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Constructive Criticisms and Community Feedback

Despite the support, players have constructive reasons to complain about Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have highlighted that it could increase wait times even longer for other modes because of the sheer number of playlists in the game already. Similarly, some areas often face mostly bots in the existing playlists. It also seems a little backwards that the mode does not begin without a required amount of real players, even though it focuses mostly on fighting AI opponents.

Lastly, one of the biggest grievances is that a previous feature was promised to offer full XP, even against bots, but that got canned when they attempted to remove XP farming from the system. Thus Casual Breakthrough seems like the community compromising halfway, as per forum feedback. Another labels this addition as the developers "making a mistake significantly, I had great enjoyment in the initial release, why did they feel the need to adjust it?"

Looking Ahead: Adjustments Occur?

Should the development team has demonstrated something to date with the latest installment, it is that they're listening and responding to feedback. Tasks that were overly hard got fixed rapidly, just like the required Redsec challenges. Chances are that, should analytics shows this recent mode isn't performing to their standards, they will not hesitate to make further modifications.